Our research programs address the unsolved hard problems at the frontier of space, autonomy, and AI — where today's answer becomes tomorrow's operational capability.
The technology industry has a long tradition of announcing innovation. We measure ours differently — by the number of research concepts that transition from a lab environment into a fielded, operational system. That transition is the hard part, and it's where most efforts fail.
Our innovation programs operate within the same engineering rigor as our delivery programs. Every research initiative has a defined objective, a deployment hypothesis, and a path to production from the outset. We are not building proofs of concept for their own sake — we are building the capabilities that will run our clients' next-generation programs.
When a concept proves out, it moves directly into our platform stack or becomes the foundation of a new program. Nothing is shelved.
Four active research programs, each targeting a specific unsolved problem with direct operational relevance. All are progressing toward deployment in live programs.
Developing verified planning and decision-making algorithms for autonomous systems operating in degraded sensor environments — where the system cannot rely on complete world state to act safely. Targeted at unmanned ground and aerial platforms in GPS-denied terrain.
Researching formally-verified methods for updating and reconfiguring flight software on active spacecraft — without ground contact and without introducing failure modes. Addresses the increasing operational tempo of commercial LEO constellations.
Building AI systems that maintain reliable performance under adversarial perturbation and deliberate data poisoning — critical for intelligence analysis, target recognition, and autonomous decision support in contested electromagnetic environments.
Developing high-fidelity digital twin architectures that maintain real-time synchronization with physical systems under communications latency — enabling predictive maintenance, anomaly detection, and mission rehearsal for space and defense assets.
Before any research begins, we define what operational capability it would enable and what program it would enter. If we can't answer that, we don't start. Innovation without a destination is speculation, not engineering.
Genuine innovation requires genuine risk. We take deliberate technical risks in our research programs — isolated from delivery programs, with defined exit criteria and bounded time horizons. We fail fast, document ruthlessly, and transfer learning immediately.
Our research engineers are not a separate function. They work alongside delivery teams and own the transition from concept to production. There is no handoff — there is continuity. The person who proved the concept is the person who validates the deployment.
Internal programs and partnerships pushing specific capability boundaries, each with a defined research mandate and a target program for deployment.
If you're facing a technical problem at the edge of what's currently possible, that's exactly the conversation we want to have. Tell us what you're trying to do.